News you can use

Obamacare outlined to Havre businesses

A Blue Cross Blue Shield representative told Havre business people Wednesday about changes they can expect when the Affordable Care Act goes into effect next year.

Frank Cote's talk included comments on a headline-grabbing issue: people's existing policies being canceled due to the act, called Obamacare.

President Barack Obama has been criticized for telling people that if they liked their current policy, under the reform act they could keep that policy.

"Technically, the president was correct,"Cote told about 30 people at a forum at Northern Montana Hospital sponsored by the Havre Area Chamber of Commerce. "If you had a policy that was in effect prior to the law and it didn't make substantial changes to that policy, it was grandfathered."

But very few grandfathered policies exist because most had to be changed, he said.

Cote said he had to sign the letters telling people their Blue Cross Blue Shield policies were being canceled.

"I'm getting a beating on that letter," he said.

Havre insurance agent Steve Mariani, who presented the program at the forum with Cote, said the letter means the policy will be canceled at its renewal date, but a new policy will be offered at that time.

"Nobody's being canceled by any means," he said. "What's happening is ... they've renamed the policies. ... That variety is now going to change to a bronze, silver, some other kind of policy."

When the cancellation date comes up, he said, "You're going to get a nicer letter from Frank that says, 'You can have this Blue Cross Blue Shield plan.'"

And both Cote and Mariani told the people at the forum that people can shop around to see which plan best fits them.

Cote said that is true for most of the issues in the health care reform - and that people and businesses can talk to insurance agents to find what their best options are.

The audience asked about many issues, such as how to figure how many employees they have - businesses with more than 50 full-time-equivalents are required to offer insurance to their employees - what is the best route as far as offering insurance for employee spouses and dependents.

Cote said it is crucial for businesses, individuals and health insurance companies to work together to find the best way to implement the health care reform.

"We all have to get creative looking at what's best" for the employer, for the employee and the employee's family, he said.

Cote added that new policies are being created, including by Blue Cross Blue Shield, to cover some of the issues that arise such as employer coverage of spouses and dependants.

Responding to some questions from the audience, Cote said some programs, such as the Tri-Care system for members and veterans of the U.S. military and their families will not be impacted by the health care reform.

He said the same is true for Medicare, aside from reducing and by 2020 closing the "donut hole" coverage gap for prescription medications.

He added that an intent of the bill is to make health insurance affordable to the lower- and middle-income people who now cannot afford it, and to keep down the rapid increases in health care and health insurance costs the nation has seen in recent decades.

Cote said provisions already in place pointed out by people in the room - such as Montana's unisex insurance code, its method of computing group insurance premiums and insurance covering wellness programs - along with "things that, in theory, if we can get them working in the system, preventative care, focus on primary care, those kinds of things, that will hopefully control costs of health care and keep down future premium increases. ...

"There is nobody in this room who believes the current system is sustainable unless we can get those increases under control," he added.

He said that the reform will need to be tweaked and adjusted as time goes on - "Nobody in Congress would say the act is perfect" - and, hopefully, that will happen in the next few years.

He said attempts to repeal or significantly change the act or have it declared unconstitutional so far have been unsuccessful, and he doubts that any will succeed.

"I just don't see this going away," Cote said.

 
 

Reader Comments(9)

poolsize writes:

Want a larger pool size? Instead of 10 people use a thousand if you wish, even a million but the numbers will be the same. 9 will be paying the costs for the ten (or the million). From what I read most likely it will be more like 5 will be be paying the costs of the 10 Use some logical thinking

Hmmm writes:

Interesting........................http://moneymorning.com/ob-article/obamacare-taxes.php?code=dis-oc-taxes

interesting writes:

10 people, really? you do understand the concept of 'pool size' do you not? google 'insurance companies misleading' or look up the lawsuits in the califas' that's cal-if-or-ni -a in case you did not know. meanwhile I will be more than happy to celebrate with the people who can now afford insurance while you continue with your 'I got mine' ideology. I will be happy that over the long term, more people will show up in the E-room with actual insurance. but go ahead and stay an ideologue

interesting writes:

that lady's name is Gail Roach from Pittsburgh. Also, the math works when you take an UNBIASED look at it, a lot of stories that started in the mainstream media about the horrors of Obamacares were later debunked. But that's not the point. the point is, do you own work looking into stuff. you should already know that leaning on others, like myself, to do your work for you is stupid. like the MSM you don't want to follow thru do you? just blame others.

Really writes:

I have only been reading stories where Obamacare is causing huge increases in costs, dropped coverages and lies told by our goverment officials. Please refer me to where you are seeing stories about folks getting insurance for a buck per month please

Thinkthink writes:

That’s great that some deserving soul can get insurance for $1.11 a month if that is true. How this is going to work. Suppose hypothetically that insurance can be provided to 10 people at $300 per month each or a total of $3,000. Now if one person all of a sudden gets a deal and only pays $1.11 a month the cost to the 10 people will still be $3,000 except it will be divided by 9 minus the $1.11 per month. Wouldn’t everyone else just be paying more because one is getting off cheap?

interesting writes:

I see there are now stories coming out about people who are getting better deals. one lady is paying 1.11 a month. another lady says 'it was cheaper to die' before she enrolled. the confusion appears to be about insurance companies misinforming their clientele at this point, time will tell. personally, I read about real people's real problems being solved and cannot believe how some continue to hold onto their ideological planks thru that. its a wonder.

dsrobins writes:

Blue Cross/Blue Shield has been bilking the citizens of Montana for decades. They are one of the largest insurance companies in America and use their market power to enforce ruthless policies. Mr Cole's remarks make clear that the company intends to continue acting just as ruthlessly in the future. Smart Montanans should find other options as soon as the ACA website is back up and running. We can all do better than BC/BS (think bull and add your own suffix.

getreal writes:

Hmm....it would've been worthwhile to be there. Mr. Cote makes it sound all very workable. But....nothing said (in this article at least) about the COST to keep your existing policy. Lots being said about people not being able to afford it because the premiums are now more than double due to Obamacare.